![]() ![]() Add bass boost of 4 dB when using pre-computed results with sound signature because all of the pre-computed results have bass boost in them. Since your input is measured by oratory1990, you should use the Harman 2018 over-ear target without bass. sound_signature looks right but you need to use compensation. Basically it would be a table sorted by the Harman preference score before equalization. Different sorting options is not going to be possible unfortunately because it's very limited what one can do with Github Markdown documents. I might implement this at some point for oratory1990's and Crinacle's measurements. It wouldn't be apples to apples comparison to rank measurements from multiple different measurement systems even if the equalization settings work independently. One could argue that the same applies for equalization but the equalization settings produced from measurements made with other systems are the best guesses into right direction, sort of attempts to be at least better than nothing. Other measurement systems are not compatible with Olive's research and do not represent human hearing accurately enough. The ranking would only really make sense for oratory1990's and crinacle's measurments. There is one big problem however and that's the incompatibility of measurement systems. If I would implement it again I would use the preference scoring system by Sean Olive instead of simple average error because it represents our perception a lot better. I actually had this at one point but removed it because thought it wasn't very useful. It would be possible but doesn't necessarily make as much sense as one might hope. Also keep in mind that you are allowed to tune the eq for example with HeSuVi to make it more to your liking. I hope this makes equalization a bit more approachable for people who feel intimidated by it. Do you think this makes your headphones sound better and what kind of problems do you have with these eq settings? I would love to hear feedback from you fellow headphone enthusiasts. Especially the target curve is a tricky thing to nail down because Innerfidelity and measurements are not directly comparable with the measurement system used by Sean Olive and others for their Harman target response research. This is not supposed to be the be-all and end-all of headphone equalization. Full details on how to use the eq settings and what else you can do with this can be found in the Github page. Combined with EqualizerAPO this is essentially a free alternative to Sonarworks True-Fi with almost 5 times as many headphone models. ![]() This includes all on-ear headphone measurements from Innerfidelity and with 4 different target curves. Now I'm exited to present to you equalization settings for over 700 headphones. ![]() Disappointment turned into resolution and this was my reaction. Then I got very disappointed of the lack of existing headphone eq settings. I started looking into headphones about a year ago and got pretty soon excited about possibilities of using equalizer to improve headphones. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |